Journal title
Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
New Zealand Geographer
26.6 weeks
26.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Medicinal Chemistry Research
13.0 weeks
15.2 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
Medicinal Chemistry Research
6.5 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Tetrahedron Letters
4.3 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Synthetic Communications
26.0 weeks
39.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
International Endodontic Journal
4.3 weeks
6.5 weeks
n/a
3 reports
2
2
Accepted
Motivation: I think review process must be more quicker
Clinical Oral Investigations
1.0 weeks
2.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
Motivation: This journal review process is very good.
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
5.3 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
5
Accepted
Chemical Engineering and Technology
2.6 weeks
25.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: I satisfied that editor's and reviewer's reaction was quite fast from the manuscript sent out to their first response,but I fell that their reaction was quite slow from my revised version resubmitted to they accepted the paper.
Applied Mathematical Modelling
34.7 weeks
43.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
Motivation: 1. After I submit my paper, the current status was "submitted to journal" for one month

2. After I resubmit my paper, (the overall decision was a minor revise), the decision process was very long.
Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering
13.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: After the second round, the decision was "reject and resubmit". Then the reviewers have been changed and I received the new reports. Since the reviewers were not the same, the points suggested by the new reviewers are completely different.
Applicable Analysis
13.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
European Journal of Pharmacology
3.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: Very fast and organized review process by the editorial office.
International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications
17.1 weeks
17.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
22.3 weeks
23.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
17.4 weeks
19.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Current Biology
8.7 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
3
Accepted
Sociology of Religion
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
5 reports
5
5
Rejected
Journal of Planning Literature
17.4 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
15.1 weeks
20.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
1
3
Accepted
Motivation: Prompt and appropriate response by the Editor, but poor work from the reviewers. Time from first submission to final acceptance (5.5 months) is too long and not really compatible with needs to spread scientific information.
Energy
8.7 weeks
9.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
PLoS ONE
21.7 weeks
30.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
ACS Combinatorial Science
6.5 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
52.1 weeks
69.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition
4.9 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: About 2 months between first submission and final acceptance is a reasonable time, compatible with academic and scientific needs
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
13.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
mBio
5.0 weeks
8.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
Scientific Reports
19.5 weeks
19.5 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
Geomorphology
7.6 weeks
7.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
3
Rejected
Motivation: The review process was speedy and largely professional. I did not get the impression however that the editor gave due consideration to the issues raised by the reviewers. As all reports specifically noted the interest of the topic and largely raised issues with manuscript structure not the underlying science it seemed a revise and resubmit decision would have been more logical. In short I was left with the impression from the decision and the comments that the editor hadn't really considered the reviews in depth.
Materials Science and Engineering, A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing
13.7 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
4
Accepted
Ecological Engineering
34.3 weeks
40.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
Tetrahedron Letters
4.3 weeks
6.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
PLoS ONE
34.0 weeks
42.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
Tetrahedron Letters
4.3 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry
8.7 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
26.0 weeks
39.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
3
Accepted
Water Resources Research
6.7 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: Throughout the submission and review process the automated system and the editorial board were professional and clear. Following initial reviews the editor provided clear instructions on how they would like the reviewers' comments to be addressed.
Tetrahedron Letters
4.3 weeks
5.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
52.1 weeks
65.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
0
Accepted
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing
13.0 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted