Review this journal

Antioxidants and Redox Signaling

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 0.8 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 2.3 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 5.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.5 compare →
Quality of review reports 2.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 4.6 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Roughly 50% of the initial reviewer's comments were data we had on hand but were hoping to publish as a follow-up article as the model system was slightly different and the overall message could have been spun to incorporate a much broader audience; however, in the end the addition of this data made for a more complete story and probably a higher appeal for the smaller, target audience of the journal. Another 20% required the generation of completely new data sets which took quite some time and in only cases do I feel added to the completeness of the story. The final 30% were minor editorial changes that mirrored the preferences of the reviewers.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Antioxidants and Redox Signaling has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.