Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.8 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
4.7 months
Decision time immediate rejection
18 days
Average number of review rounds
1.9 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
2.9 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
3.3 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.4 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.3 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 6.1 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
One of the reviewer's was completely incompetent to review this manuscript. Their comments indicated that they had no subject knowledge nor understanding of basic concepts addressed in the manuscript. The reviewer also made baseless comments about e.g. quality of the English. Such a poor quality review (the other review was positive) should not have been the basis of a rejection, especially after a revision that thoroughly and politely responded to every review comment.