Welcome to SciRev

Share your experience with the scientific review process and select an efficient journal for submitting your manuscripts.

Search for a journal

Learn more »

If you have recently submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal, please fill out our short questionnaire to let other researchers benefit from your experience. Use this search engine to go to the journal page and press the "review" button.

Search for a scientific discipline

List of all disciplines Learn more »

If you are looking for an efficient journal to submit your manuscript to, use this search engine to go to your scientific field and compare the performance of its journals on duration and quality of the review process and on the way they handle manuscripts.

Journal covers on SciRev

SciRev poll

Free scientific ads

SciRev offers the scientific community the possibility to place free scientific ads.

More info

SciRev news

SciRev article appeared in Scientometrics

Article based on SciRev data has been published in Scientometrics. The paper is available here. Duration of the peer review process takes on average 17 weeks and differs much between scientific fields. Medicine, Public healt…

Read more »

Latest reviews

  1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
    1st review round: 3.4 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  2. Applied Physics Letters
    1st review round: 3.0 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  3. RSC Advances
    1st review round: 10.4 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  4. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces
    1st review round: 6.4 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  5. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
    1st review round: 32.1 wks
    Overall rating: 0 (very bad)
    Show all »
  6. Marine Biodiversity
    1st review round: 16.4 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  7. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies
    1st review round: 18.0 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  8. Carbohydrate Polymers
    1st review round: 4.0 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  9. American Journal of Materials Engineering and Technology
    1st review round: 2.7 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  10. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
    1st review round: 36.6 wks
    Overall rating: 0 (very bad)
    Show all »
  11. Personnel Review
    1st review round: 25.3 wks
    Overall rating: 0 (very bad)
    Show all »
  12. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
    1st review round: 11.4 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  13. Australian Journal of Psychology
    1st review round: 6.0 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  14. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences
    1st review round: 11.1 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  15. Geologica Carpathica
    1st review round: 10.0 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  16. Frontiers in Plant Science
    1st review round: 7.0 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  17. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
    1st review round: 14.3 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  18. Biological Psychology
    1st review round: 4.4 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  19. PLoS Computational Biology
    1st review round: 5.0 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  20. Social Theory and Health
    1st review round: 12.0 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »