Welcome to SciRev

Share your experience with the scientific review process and select an efficient journal for submitting your manuscripts.

Search for a journal

Learn more »

If you have recently submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal, please fill out our short questionnaire to let other researchers benefit from your experience. Use this search engine to go to the journal page and press the "review" button.

Search for a scientific discipline

List of all disciplines Learn more »

If you are looking for an efficient journal to submit your manuscript to, use this search engine to go to your scientific field and compare the performance of its journals on duration and quality of the review process and on the way they handle manuscripts.

Journal covers on SciRev

SciRev poll

Free scientific ads

SciRev offers the scientific community the possibility to place free scientific ads.

More info

SciRev news

SciRev article appeared in Scientometrics

Article based on SciRev data has been published in Scientometrics. The paper is available here. Duration of the peer review process takes on average 17 weeks and differs much between scientific fields. Medicine, Public healt…

Read more »

Latest reviews

  1. ISA Transactions
    1st review round: 10.0 wks
    Overall rating: 2 (moderate)
    Show all »
  2. Global Change Biology
    1st review round: 10.1 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  3. Food Chemistry
    1st review round: 29.4 wks
    Overall rating: 0 (very bad)
    Show all »
  4. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering
    1st review round: 19.3 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  5. Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova
    1st review round: 13.0 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  6. IEEE Sensors Journal
    1st review round: 4.3 wks
    Overall rating: 1 (bad)
    Show all »
  7. Solar Energy
    1st review round: 12.6 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  8. Journal of Education and Work
    1st review round: 18.4 wks
    Overall rating: 2 (moderate)
    Show all »
  9. BMC Cancer
    1st review round: 32.1 wks
    Overall rating: 1 (bad)
    Show all »
  10. Agronomy for Sustainable Development
    1st review round: 13.3 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  11. Neuropsychology
    1st review round: 12.3 wks
    Overall rating: 1 (bad)
    Show all »
  12. Journal of Water and Climate Change
    1st review round: 4.1 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  13. Energies
    1st review round: 1.3 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  14. Endocrinology
    1st review round: 2.0 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  15. Journal of Developmental Biology
    1st review round: 2.0 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  16. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
    1st review round: 6.4 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  17. Fossil Record
    1st review round: 6.9 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  18. International Journal of Applied Science Research and Review
    1st review round: 3.0 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  19. PLoS ONE
    1st review round: 8.1 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  20. Algebra and Number Theory
    1st review round: 7.3 wks
    Overall rating: 1 (bad)
    Show all »