Welcome to SciRev

Share your experience with the scientific review process and select an efficient journal for submitting your manuscripts.

Search for a journal

Learn more »

If you have recently submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal, please fill out our short questionnaire to let other researchers benefit from your experience. Use this search engine to go to the journal page and press the "review" button.

Search for a scientific discipline

List of all disciplines Learn more »

If you are looking for an efficient journal to submit your manuscript to, use this search engine to go to your scientific field and compare the performance of its journals on duration and quality of the review process and on the way they handle manuscripts.

Journal covers on SciRev

SciRev poll

Free scientific ads

SciRev offers the scientific community the possibility to place free scientific ads.

More info

SciRev news

SciRev article appeared in Scientometrics

Article based on SciRev data has been published in Scientometrics. The paper is available here. Duration of the peer review process takes on average 17 weeks and differs much between scientific fields. Medicine, Public healt…

Read more »

Latest reviews

  1. International Journal of Molecular Sciences
    1st review round: 2.1 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  2. Fluid Dynamics and Materials Processing
    1st review round: 1.0 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  3. Carbohydrate Research
    1st review round: 7.6 wks
    Overall rating: 2 (moderate)
    Show all »
  4. Materials Science and Engineering, C: Materials for Biological Applications
    1st review round: 18.2 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  5. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
    1st review round: 17.1 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  6. Circulation
    1st review round: 2.4 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  7. Australian Journal of Botany
    1st review round: 6.4 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  8. PLoS ONE
    1st review round: 11.0 wks
    Overall rating: 0 (very bad)
    Show all »
  9. Scientific Reports
    1st review round: 22.7 wks
    Overall rating: 1 (bad)
    Show all »
  10. Ecography
    1st review round: 26.9 wks
    Overall rating: 0 (very bad)
    Show all »
  11. ACS Nano
    1st review round: 3.9 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  12. Journal of the American Chemical Society
    1st review round: 4.0 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  13. Nanoscale
    1st review round: 5.4 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  14. Nature Communications
    1st review round: 3.7 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  15. Angewandte Chemie
    1st review round: 3.4 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  16. Nano Letters
    1st review round: 5.6 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  17. Energy and Fuels
    1st review round: 3.7 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  18. Journal of Materials Science
    1st review round: 4.3 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  19. Energy Research and Social Science
    1st review round: 2.7 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  20. Armed Forces and Society
    1st review round: 104.2 wks
    Overall rating: 2 (moderate)
    Show all »