Journal title
Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Motivation and Emotion
17.9 weeks
28.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: Excellent reviewers. Great turn around time.
British Journal of Dermatology
7.9 weeks
12.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Arthropod Structure and Development
9.1 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
30.9 weeks
35.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
5
Accepted
Cognitive Neuropsychology
12.7 weeks
12.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
2
1
Rejected
Computers and Geosciences
12.0 weeks
20.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
3
Accepted
Motivation: The initial review process took longer than expected. The journal requests that reviews be submitted in 3 weeks, but it took about 12 weeks to get a response. The reviewers didn't seem to have many comments of substance, but revision was requested. This would have been less irksome of the initial decision had come sooner. It is worth noting that the proofing process introduced grammatical and spelling mistakes into the paper that hadn't been present previously.
Computers and Geosciences
15.9 weeks
15.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
3
Accepted
Motivation: The journal requests that reviews be completed within 3 weeks, so it's disappointing that this process took nearly 16 weeks. Typesetting/proofing introduced errors into the manuscript. The editors were flexible about the timing of publication.
Work, Employment and Society
14.1 weeks
37.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: The second round took a bit too long
Journal of Ethnopharmacology
26.0 weeks
30.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
Cortex
13.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
Child Development
16.7 weeks
38.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
26.4 weeks
30.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
2
Accepted
Automatica
21.7 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Automatica
26.0 weeks
39.1 weeks
n/a
4 reports
4
4
Accepted
Global Change Biology
8.0 weeks
8.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
International Journal of Mineral Processing
26.0 weeks
32.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
Motivation: First review process took to long
Journal of Biogeography
13.0 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
International Journal of Psychophysiology
8.7 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
Motivation: Some of the reviews were useful, some not..
Journal of Power Sources
8.7 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
2
Accepted
Motivation: My may concer about to this manuscript and this Journal is that I received an extra reviewer report by a new reviewer after resubmit the paper revised according to the comments of the two first reviewers. Thus, the paper was published with a big delay time. More than one year.
Tourism and Hospitality Research
5.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Anales de Psicologia
62.1 weeks
88.2 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
Revista de Educacion
21.1 weeks
34.2 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis
6.9 weeks
6.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Tetrahedron
8.0 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
6 reports
4
5
Accepted
PNAS
3.1 weeks
3.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
1
1
Rejected
Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis
9.6 weeks
10.6 weeks
n/a
4 reports
5
5
Accepted
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
8.4 weeks
10.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis
2.7 weeks
3.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Chemical Reviews
4.4 weeks
7.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Tetrahedron
7.6 weeks
9.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
FASEB Journal
Immediately accepted after 8.7 weeks
Accepted (im.)
Infection and Immunity
8.7 weeks
11.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
Cellular Microbiology
4.3 weeks
8.3 weeks
n/a
4 reports
4
4
Accepted
Chemical Reviews
7.6 weeks
8.1 weeks
n/a
5 reports
5
5
Accepted
Trends in Microbiology
5.0 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
4
4
Accepted
Journal of Immunology
5.0 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
FASEB Journal
4.0 weeks
11.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
3
3
Rejected
Neuropsychologia
7.9 weeks
10.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
Motivation: The first reviews had not exactly grasped the subject of my paper, whereas this was more correctly appreciated after reading the revised version and the responses to the reviewers.
Neuropsychologia
3.7 weeks
4.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: Some methodological aspects of the study were not correct and the reviewers' suggestions were very useful
Clinical Infectious Diseases
6.0 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: No additional comments. .