SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 80 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 2.6 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 4.0 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 18 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.9 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.2 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 2.8 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.8 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 38.7 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Rejected.

We sent our work to PLOS One because it is supposed to provide high-quality, fast reviews. We asked every couple of months, and the paper, at least up to the 6th month, did not have an assigned editor yet. We finally got the reviews after 8 months, with one reviewer advising acceptance and one reviewer rejection, and got an outright rejection. I believe that we should have gotten a third review, and that the two reviews we got are not high quality and were not fast. Overall, a disappointing (and slow) experience.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of PLoS ONE has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: General, Medicine

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.