Journal title
Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
Immediately accepted after 3.5 weeks
Accepted (im.)
Movement Disorders
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
4.0 weeks
4.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
BMC Bioinformatics
6.5 weeks
22.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis
4.3 weeks
4.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: I took reviewers comments very positively and these were genuine in order to improve the manuscript. I appreciate journal policy and editor's response in this regards, and publishing team also was very helpful
Molecular Ecology
5.4 weeks
12.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
Analytical Biochemistry
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Teaching and Learning in Nursing
5.0 weeks
7.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Journal of Biological Chemistry
2.0 weeks
2.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Molecular Ecology
5.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
Motivation: Very swift response and good reviewers
International Journal of Health Planning and Management
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Experimental Cell Research
2.7 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
3
Accepted
Motivation: In this specific occasion, reviewing process was very fast but a little bit less accurate than usual, according to my previous experience with the same journal. However, proof editing and all associated editorial services respected a high standard.
Carbon
8.7 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Journal of Materials Chemistry
3.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Physics of Plasmas
5.0 weeks
5.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Land Use Policy
6.0 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry, A
26.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
1
Accepted
Motivation: Manuscript did not get a positive review because of the interest conflict. Now we have got two negative reviews both from one reviewer. We have sent letter to Editor-in-Chief to get review from other reviewer. We have several successful cases of our manuscripts published in that Journal. That is a single interpersonal conflict. We hope to get a positive review.
Journal of Seismology
13.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Theory, Culture and Society
14.0 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
0 reports
n/a
1
Rejected
Motivation: I think not providing a single reason for rejection is unacceptable. Apparently the decision was based on "inner circle referees" and made in a physical meeting, so no reports available.
Chemical Vapor Deposition
3.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
Journal of Luminescence
4.3 weeks
6.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences
6.4 weeks
8.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: Generaly the review process was fast. Both Reviewers had minor comments. After revised manuscript Editor-in-chief gave possitive note and accepted manuscript.
Journal of Synchrotron Radiation
17.1 weeks
18.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
3
Accepted
Space Weather
6.3 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: I fully satisfied by the review process
Surface Science
Immediately accepted after 2.0 weeks
Accepted (im.)
Motivation: There was an original paper, new lattice gas system, completely new results with exact theory, the results were perfectly confirmed by the MC simulations. The referees really cant put forward any critical remarks.
Zoomorphology
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: I think the editor showed great interest in publishing my manuscript. The peer review process and the publication of the article were quick. I have gotten pleasure in publishing in the Zoomorphology Journal.
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
13.0 weeks
16.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
3
Accepted
Motivation: The journal is rapid in its review process, the editors are friendly and willing to help at all times.
All our concerns were resolved immediately.
It is a very serious journal
Applied Geochemistry
8.7 weeks
17.6 weeks
n/a
4 reports
4
4
Accepted
Annals of Tourism Research
13.4 weeks
51.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
3
Accepted
ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces
4.3 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
Nanotechnology
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Geophysics
4.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
7.0 weeks
11.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
Food Quality and Preference
3.5 weeks
3.8 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: Fast process and clear communication from the editor.
Reproduction
4.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Journal of Geometry and Physics
23.9 weeks
32.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: Very good reviewer, the editor was a little bit slow in dealing with paper
Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology
4.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
Food Science and Technology International
52.1 weeks
69.4 weeks
n/a
4 reports
4
2
Accepted
Motivation: The first comment about some technical improvement and graphs re-arranging was very quick so it gave positive feeling, but then the review process took forever, and it took two letters to the editor to receive he first review decision which was followed by two more. Overall time till acceptance was approximately 1.5 years and additional I think 3 months time till on-line publication, which was too long. The reviews on the other side were very correct, constructive and helpful.
Postharvest Biology and Technology
25.0 weeks
33.3 weeks
n/a
4 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was very useful and the reviewers read carefully the manuscript and their comments were very constructive.
Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
7.1 weeks
11.5 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted