Journal title
Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Water Research
13.0 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
Water Research
13.0 weeks
13.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
Geobiology
6.7 weeks
16.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
3
Accepted
Journal of Physical Chemistry, C
4.3 weeks
4.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
International Journal of Engineering Science
16.1 weeks
16.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
5
Accepted
Tetrahedron
13.3 weeks
14.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
5
Accepted
Current Organic Chemistry
13.4 weeks
14.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
European Journal of Immunology
5.9 weeks
10.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
Tetrahedron Letters
8.7 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
4
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was fast and I have no complaints.
Journal of Geochemical Exploration
6.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: The reviewers of this journal were quite fast and also they were expert enough to analyse the quality of my paper
Soft Matter
5.0 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
Acta Geophysica
13.0 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
8.1 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
5
Accepted
PLoS ONE
13.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
Demography
45.0 weeks
45.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
1
Rejected
Astronomy Letters
3.3 weeks
3.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was almost excellent except sometimes I had to activate the referees and inform them about the most recent advances in the field.
Social Indicators Research
13.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Journal of Public Health
4.6 weeks
4.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
International Mathematics Research Notices
8.7 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: Our manuscript was handled within 3 months which in my experience is quite fast.
Transport in Porous Media
75.1 weeks
75.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
4.3 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
Motivation: The turn-around time was fast, the reviewers' comments were relevant and useful, and the communication with the journal editor was clear.
Molecules
2.0 weeks
2.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Journal of Philosophy of Education
52.1 weeks
121.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
0
Accepted
Motivation: Extremely slow process. We had to write to the editor several times to ask what happened to the manuscript and why we did not hear anything after 6 of 10 months of complete silence.
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
4.0 weeks
4.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
British Journal of General Practice
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research
5.7 weeks
5.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
Motivation: The peer reviewed journal is serious and rapid.
European Sociological Review
16.6 weeks
41.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: Excellent and rather fast reviews
Journal of Neuroscience
3.1 weeks
6.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
Organic Process Research and Development
8.7 weeks
9.7 weeks
n/a
4 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: Review process has taken 4 months time from submission to publication. It needs to be improved.
Work, Employment and Society
14.1 weeks
36.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
Scientia Pharmaceutica
5.7 weeks
8.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: publication process is quite slow after acceptance. It needs to be improved.
Journal of the Institute of Brewing
26.0 weeks
34.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
3
Accepted
Motivation: Otherwise high-quality editorial process, although very long and laborious. Editor-in-Chief was very fair and understanding, but still - much too long process.
International Journal of Public Opinion Research
15.3 weeks
28.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: Very fast ad professional review
Scientia Pharmaceutica
6.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: publication process is quite slow
Quality and Quantity
n/a
n/a
68 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Considering that the review process took almost 3 months and no external reviewer process was done, as well as no comments from editor came, I consider this as inappropriate and inefficient
Scientia Pharmaceutica
5.7 weeks
6.4 weeks
n/a
4 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: review process is good, but publication process is slow
Public Opinion Quarterly
14.1 weeks
14.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
3
Rejected
Motivation: There were two acceptance (revise&resumbmit) and one rejection, so the editor could give us chance (also considering that the paper was highly published at the end). Nevertheless, the reviews were of a good quality
Scientia Pharmaceutica
5.7 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
Motivation: The over all rating of this journal is good in quality, but publication process needs to be improved
Organic Letters
2.0 weeks
2.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted