Journal title
Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications
17.1 weeks
17.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
22.3 weeks
23.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
17.4 weeks
19.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Current Biology
8.7 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
3
Accepted
Sociology of Religion
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
5 reports
5
5
Rejected
Journal of Planning Literature
17.4 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
15.1 weeks
20.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
1
3
Accepted
Motivation: Prompt and appropriate response by the Editor, but poor work from the reviewers. Time from first submission to final acceptance (5.5 months) is too long and not really compatible with needs to spread scientific information.
Energy
8.7 weeks
9.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
PLoS ONE
21.7 weeks
30.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
ACS Combinatorial Science
6.5 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
52.1 weeks
69.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition
4.9 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: About 2 months between first submission and final acceptance is a reasonable time, compatible with academic and scientific needs
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
13.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
mBio
5.0 weeks
8.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
Scientific Reports
19.5 weeks
19.5 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
Geomorphology
7.6 weeks
7.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
3
Rejected
Motivation: The review process was speedy and largely professional. I did not get the impression however that the editor gave due consideration to the issues raised by the reviewers. As all reports specifically noted the interest of the topic and largely raised issues with manuscript structure not the underlying science it seemed a revise and resubmit decision would have been more logical. In short I was left with the impression from the decision and the comments that the editor hadn't really considered the reviews in depth.
Materials Science and Engineering, A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing
13.7 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
4
Accepted
Ecological Engineering
34.3 weeks
40.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
Tetrahedron Letters
4.3 weeks
6.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
PLoS ONE
34.0 weeks
42.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
Tetrahedron Letters
4.3 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry
8.7 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
26.0 weeks
39.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
3
Accepted
Water Resources Research
6.7 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: Throughout the submission and review process the automated system and the editorial board were professional and clear. Following initial reviews the editor provided clear instructions on how they would like the reviewers' comments to be addressed.
Tetrahedron Letters
4.3 weeks
5.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
52.1 weeks
65.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
0
Accepted
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing
13.0 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
Natural Product Research
4.3 weeks
6.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Molecular Diversity
8.7 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
Motivation: My experience with review process was not very much satisfactory.
Natural Product Research
4.3 weeks
4.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Global Change Biology
n/a
n/a
5 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
21.7 weeks
34.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: Reviews were spot on and helpful; reviewing time was acceptable
Organic Letters
2.9 weeks
2.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: In my case the review process was very fast and I am very happy with that.
Environmental Science and Technology
14.4 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
3
Accepted
Experimental Cell Research
6.6 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
4
Accepted
Discourse Processes
14.6 weeks
16.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
Neurochemistry International
4.3 weeks
7.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control
12.3 weeks
55.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
4
Accepted
Motivation: The review process is delayed significantly due to one reviewer who did not revise the paper on time. Also the associate editor did not asses the reviewers results for a long time.
ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
4.9 weeks
4.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
4
Rejected
Motivation: The paper was revised by 3 referees and although the comments two of them were rather positive and only one shown some major concerns paper was rejected. On the other hand editor left some possibility to accepted the paper if the changes will be performed according to comments of referees
African Journal of Reproductive Health
8.7 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted