Journal title
Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
7.3 weeks
12.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
7.4 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
5
Accepted
6.1 weeks
8.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
8.7 weeks
9.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: excellent
4.3 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
13.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
3
Accepted
Motivation: Published twice on the journal. First time the editors were very active and up to their job; got the reviews back quickly as well as a reasoned decision. When submitted the second paper the editors had changed. The process was considerably slower and the editors seemed to have hard time in making the final decision.
4.0 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
10.0 weeks
30.8 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
2
Accepted
4.3 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
2
Accepted
Motivation: The referee based on its "eventual" experience did not believe the results. Only after same mails directly with the editor the manuscript was accepted.
8.7 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
17.4 weeks
34.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
13.9 weeks
16.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2.0 weeks
4.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: Evaluations were made to improve the quality of the manuscript. A reviewer in particular has very interesting suggestions on chemometric tools used, worthy of a participant co-authored the article. We were very pleased.
17.4 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Rejected
Motivation: Failed to inspire the reviewers, and apparently failed to communicate clearly as most of the points criticized are actually in the manuscript. Standard handling of the manuscript.
60.8 weeks
60.8 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
4
Accepted
1.0 weeks
1.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: It is excellent journal in its impact and discipline.
14.6 weeks
23.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
32.0 weeks
32.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
3
Accepted
21.3 weeks
25.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: Reviews from this journal although takes long are very constructive
19.7 weeks
20.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: As soon as the comments by the reviewers were addressed to then the manuscript was accepted
16.7 weeks
16.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Rejected
Motivation: Failed to inspire the reviewers, and then one of the reviewers suggested rejection because of many minor issues. Comments are to the point and will help strengthen the paper.
4.3 weeks
9.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: All the reviews were aimed at improving the quality of the manuscript.
8.7 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was fair and fast
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
Immediately accepted after 4.3 weeks
Accepted (im.)
Motivation: The review process and publication with Elsevier was outstanding.
1.4 weeks
3.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
8.7 weeks
11.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
Motivation: although it took some time, but the reviewers were very accurate, and the review process was smooth and justified.
6.0 weeks
6.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
Immediately accepted after 4.3 weeks
Accepted (im.)
4.3 weeks
6.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
13.0 weeks
16.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
Motivation: I had a very positive and productive interaction with the editorial office, especially with the processing of figures
Immediately accepted after 3.5 weeks
Accepted (im.)
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
4.0 weeks
4.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
6.5 weeks
22.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
4.3 weeks
4.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: I took reviewers comments very positively and these were genuine in order to improve the manuscript. I appreciate journal policy and editor's response in this regards, and publishing team also was very helpful
5.4 weeks
12.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
5.0 weeks
7.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2.0 weeks
2.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted