Applied Physics Letters

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Applied Physics Letters has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a
Disciplines: Physics

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 17 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 0.9 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 1.3 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 6 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 1.6 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.9 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.4 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 3.8 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 4.0 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Drawn back.

Motivation:
Reviews from APL tend to be not very detailed, as I've gone through and had papers accepted with them in the past. I'm always happy with their relatively quick turnaround times. However, this time we had an unreasonable request from a reviewer, who requested additional experiments (make new samples and build a new set-up for different kinds of measurements), additional simulations, additional calculations, and completely new figures to recapture all the new info. I believe this is asking too much for APL. This request would be sufficient for a completely separate and higher impact paper. We decided it wasn't worth it and withdrew our submission and decided to go elsewhere.