Journal title
Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
3.1 weeks
3.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
1
1
Rejected
9.6 weeks
10.6 weeks
n/a
4 reports
5
5
Accepted
8.4 weeks
10.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2.7 weeks
3.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
4.4 weeks
7.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
7.6 weeks
9.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Immediately accepted after 8.7 weeks
Accepted (im.)
8.7 weeks
11.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
4.3 weeks
8.3 weeks
n/a
4 reports
4
4
Accepted
7.6 weeks
8.1 weeks
n/a
5 reports
5
5
Accepted
5.0 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
4
4
Accepted
5.0 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
4.0 weeks
11.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
3
3
Rejected
7.9 weeks
10.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
Motivation: The first reviews had not exactly grasped the subject of my paper, whereas this was more correctly appreciated after reading the revised version and the responses to the reviewers.
3.7 weeks
4.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: Some methodological aspects of the study were not correct and the reviewers' suggestions were very useful
6.0 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: No additional comments. .
13.0 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
13.0 weeks
13.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
6.7 weeks
16.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
3
Accepted
4.3 weeks
4.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
16.1 weeks
16.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
5
Accepted
13.3 weeks
14.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
5
Accepted
13.4 weeks
14.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
5.9 weeks
10.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
8.7 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
4
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was fast and I have no complaints.
6.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: The reviewers of this journal were quite fast and also they were expert enough to analyse the quality of my paper
5.0 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
13.0 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
8.1 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
5
Accepted
13.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
45.0 weeks
45.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
1
Rejected
3.3 weeks
3.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was almost excellent except sometimes I had to activate the referees and inform them about the most recent advances in the field.
13.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
4.6 weeks
4.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
8.7 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: Our manuscript was handled within 3 months which in my experience is quite fast.
75.1 weeks
75.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
4.3 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
Motivation: The turn-around time was fast, the reviewers' comments were relevant and useful, and the communication with the journal editor was clear.
2.0 weeks
2.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
52.1 weeks
121.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
0
Accepted
Motivation: Extremely slow process. We had to write to the editor several times to ask what happened to the manuscript and why we did not hear anything after 6 of 10 months of complete silence.