Latest review
First review round: 8.0 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent).
Outcome: Rejected.
Motivation:
Fast review, very good revisions that really aimed to help. Reviewers had good comments so the rejection was a little bit unexpected, but we understand as it is a competetive journal. Editor argued that the corrections suggested by the referees would turn the manuscript too long for this journal, and thus they recommended transference to another journal.