Journal title
Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Sensors
10.6 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was fairly smooth. I have only few problems with one of the reviewer tha in my opinion was not a great expert in the field of the manuscript
Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
64.4 weeks
66.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
Hydrobiologia
21.6 weeks
21.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Neotropical Entomology
9.4 weeks
17.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
8.4 weeks
10.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Environmental Microbiology
45.6 weeks
45.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Robotics and Autonomous Systems
17.1 weeks
19.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
Motivation: Most of the reviewers' comments were useful and helped improving the quality of the accepted manuscript.
Radiation Measurements
10.6 weeks
15.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
Motivation: It was a good experience for me to submit and follow my manuscript with this journal
Current Eye Research
27.4 weeks
28.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
2
Accepted
Pteridines
3.6 weeks
3.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
European Journal of Communication
8.7 weeks
13.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Immediately accepted after 1.7 weeks
Accepted (im.)
Motivation: It was amazing. Before the submit my article, the proof-reading was done. I think that it was a good choice.
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
8.4 weeks
8.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
1
4
Accepted
BMJ Open
16.9 weeks
21.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
11.1 weeks
25.4 weeks
n/a
4 reports
5
5
Accepted
Development in Practice
11.0 weeks
15.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: The expertise and speed with which my paper was processed by Development in Practice (DiP) were commendable
General Hospital Psychiatry
5.7 weeks
18.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Applied Surface Science
12.3 weeks
12.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
5
Accepted
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
4.9 weeks
4.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: The comments received from the editor and the two reviewers were very objective, systematic, constructive and even inspiring. They included some editing in the wording. Also, they helped us clarify and re-write some ambiguous points and redesign tables. For few of the comments that we felt inappropriate, we sent back explanations and justifications to support our views. These justifications were accepted. Our authorship group considered this experiences indeed a rich and inspiring one!
World Bank Economic Review
n/a
n/a
140 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Very long time for desk rejection
Optics Express
4.4 weeks
4.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
Systems and Control Letters
18.3 weeks
23.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
5.6 weeks
11.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: Very professional with areal willingness to improve the paper
Vox Sanguinis
9.1 weeks
17.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: Very professionnal
Blood
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Transfusion
7.3 weeks
7.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
1
Rejected
Motivation: The manuscript was not considered as a high priority by the editor, so why to sent it to external reviewers.
BMC Health Services Research
7.3 weeks
14.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
Motivation: Rapid review
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
30.1 weeks
30.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
2
Rejected
Motivation: Too long
British Food Journal
9.1 weeks
9.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: Fast and straightforward process. The reviewers had many insightful suggestions that really improved the paper.
International Journal of Consumer Studies
n/a
n/a
12 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The editor thought it was not a good fit for the journal, without much explanation.
Nature Materials
n/a
n/a
2 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Quick responce! Rejected within 3 days. Do did not have to waste time!
BMC Research Notes
n/a
n/a
26 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation: My manuscript was not found suitable for BMC Research Notes and the editorial team suggested to transfer my manuscript to Journal of Medical Case Reports. I agreed to the transfer.
Journal of Medical Case Reports
27.0 weeks
38.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: I do not have any negative experience or any criticism to the Journal of Medical Case Reports. My overall experience was positive. The review process was slow. I am happy with the outcome. My manuscript was published.
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
Immediately accepted after 15.4 weeks
Accepted (im.)
International Journal of Human Resource Management
28.9 weeks
72.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
14.1 weeks
27.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Nanoscale Research Letters
9.3 weeks
15.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Disease Models and Mechanisms: DMM
3.0 weeks
7.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: Professional and competent handling by the editors, fair and helpful reviewers.
Eukaryotic Cell
0.1 weeks
0.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: The fastest review process I've ever seen, and not for the first time with this journal. Fair, fast, and very helpful. The submission system is also highly author-friendly.
Eukaryotic Cell
0.7 weeks
0.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
5
Accepted
Motivation: Fast, friendly, and professional handling by the editor; helpful, polite, and professional reviewer comments