SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 31 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 2.3 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 6.9 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 10 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 3.3 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.8 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.5 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 2.5 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 3.7 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 20.4 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Rejected.

Article was first reviewed by two advisory board members (apart from the editor handling the manuscript). They suggested some changes before it can actually sent out to the external review. After a month, we re-submitted the article and it was sent to two reviewers. One was positive and recommended the article for publication and second reviewer one was too naive (someone who is a direct competitor in the field), and tried to block the article from publication in Science and hence gave very bad rating to the manuscript. Editor decided to reject the manuscript based on second reviewer's comments. My experience is that once the article is under review, it does not matter that its Science or whichever journal, it's just an ordinary article and one should not expect good detailed comments on the name of journal's reputation.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Science has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: General

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.