Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 11 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 1.3 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 1.5 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 14 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 2.3 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.7 compare →
Quality of review reports 2.6 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 2.6 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.9 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 5.0 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

A colleague suggested we sent our paper fairly standard computational manuscript to PCCP which neither of us has tried before. We thought the paper would go through normal peer review with typical responses which we usually get from our usual go-to ACS J Phys Chem B ot J. Am. Chem Soc. The review took more than the estimated time in PCCP (3-4 weeoks) and amounted to 1 month + 1 week which is fine we are all busy people. The real shock was when we read the response. (i) First, there was only one reviewer! Not even two just one! (ii) That single reviewer was clearly outsider to our field based on generic questions! (iii) The real shock, however, was that despite the fact that the reviewer asked honest questions and gave suggestions the editor felt appropriate to make a rejecting decision!! At this point, we decided to write to the senior editor as we felt this was gross incompetence on the part of PCCP team. The senior editor apologized and offered us to resubmit and sent for another round. Long story we resubmit and a week later we get another single review making short offhand comments unrelated to our paper but with a clear intent to quickly reject our paper. After 2+ month we are left with no proper review, this is unacceptable. Perhaps we had bad luck with the editor but we are never risking wasting our time on PCCP again. Why bother JPCB is a better journal anyway.