Journal title
Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
14.6 weeks
23.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
32.0 weeks
32.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
3
Accepted
21.3 weeks
25.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: Reviews from this journal although takes long are very constructive
19.7 weeks
20.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: As soon as the comments by the reviewers were addressed to then the manuscript was accepted
16.7 weeks
16.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Rejected
Motivation: Failed to inspire the reviewers, and then one of the reviewers suggested rejection because of many minor issues. Comments are to the point and will help strengthen the paper.
4.3 weeks
9.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: All the reviews were aimed at improving the quality of the manuscript.
8.7 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was fair and fast
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
Immediately accepted after 4.3 weeks
Accepted (im.)
Motivation: The review process and publication with Elsevier was outstanding.
1.4 weeks
3.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
8.7 weeks
11.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
Motivation: although it took some time, but the reviewers were very accurate, and the review process was smooth and justified.
6.0 weeks
6.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
Immediately accepted after 4.3 weeks
Accepted (im.)
4.3 weeks
6.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
13.0 weeks
16.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
Motivation: I had a very positive and productive interaction with the editorial office, especially with the processing of figures
Immediately accepted after 3.5 weeks
Accepted (im.)
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
4.0 weeks
4.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
6.5 weeks
22.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
4.3 weeks
4.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: I took reviewers comments very positively and these were genuine in order to improve the manuscript. I appreciate journal policy and editor's response in this regards, and publishing team also was very helpful
5.4 weeks
12.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
5.0 weeks
7.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2.0 weeks
2.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
5.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
Motivation: Very swift response and good reviewers
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2.7 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
3
Accepted
Motivation: In this specific occasion, reviewing process was very fast but a little bit less accurate than usual, according to my previous experience with the same journal. However, proof editing and all associated editorial services respected a high standard.
8.7 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
3.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
5.0 weeks
5.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
6.0 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
26.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
1
Accepted
Motivation: Manuscript did not get a positive review because of the interest conflict. Now we have got two negative reviews both from one reviewer. We have sent letter to Editor-in-Chief to get review from other reviewer. We have several successful cases of our manuscripts published in that Journal. That is a single interpersonal conflict. We hope to get a positive review.
13.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
14.0 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
0 reports
n/a
1
Rejected
Motivation: I think not providing a single reason for rejection is unacceptable. Apparently the decision was based on "inner circle referees" and made in a physical meeting, so no reports available.
3.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
4.3 weeks
6.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
6.4 weeks
8.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: Generaly the review process was fast. Both Reviewers had minor comments. After revised manuscript Editor-in-chief gave possitive note and accepted manuscript.
17.1 weeks
18.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
3
Accepted
6.3 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: I fully satisfied by the review process
Immediately accepted after 2.0 weeks
Accepted (im.)
Motivation: There was an original paper, new lattice gas system, completely new results with exact theory, the results were perfectly confirmed by the MC simulations. The referees really cant put forward any critical remarks.