Review this journal

Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 2.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 2.0 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 1.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

Outcome: Drawn back.

The entire process was a nightmare. The paper has to be sent to a member of the editorial board. I did not get any acknowledgment that my paper was received, so I sent a kind request to inquire about it. This time I got my acknowledgment. However I did not hear anything from the journal for almost one year. I finally decided to contact the editorial member to whom I sent the paper, at least twice, but I did not get any reply. After 1 year I gave up and sent the paper to another journal, which was also quite slow. As a result, the paper took 3 years from the date it was finished to the date it was published.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.