Review this journal

Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 2.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 2.0 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 1.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

Outcome: Drawn back.

Motivation:
The entire process was a nightmare. The paper has to be sent to a member of the editorial board. I did not get any acknowledgment that my paper was received, so I sent a kind request to inquire about it. This time I got my acknowledgment. However I did not hear anything from the journal for almost one year. I finally decided to contact the editorial member to whom I sent the paper, at least twice, but I did not get any reply. After 1 year I gave up and sent the paper to another journal, which was also quite slow. As a result, the paper took 3 years from the date it was finished to the date it was published.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.