Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
3.4 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.7 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
4.0 / 5.0 (difficult)
Average number of review reports
5.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
5.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
5.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 14.9 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
This journal may not be highly regarded in accordance with different journal ranking. And yet, the editorial team had really done a good job giving advice on how the paper should be improved, especially by consolidating the comments from different reviewers. They would highlight the more important and essential comments, so that authors do not have to entertain unreasonable comments. What they have done is a role model for all other journals editors.