Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.8 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
1.8 months
Decision time immediate rejection
49 days
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
3.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.5 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 3.0 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
I was overall very happy with the reviews I received from this journal and their reasoning for rejecting the manuscript. It also was a fairly quick process. However, I believe one of the reviews was a bit unprofessional, as they started it by saying they were recommending rejection and then provided reasons for it. This is in contrast to how I've been taught to review a manuscript.
2.5
Good process
3 reviews
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines

Neuroscience Applied psychology

Related journals

Neuron Current Biology Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience