Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Rejected
2019
Motivation: I was overall very happy with the reviews I received from this journal and their reasoning for rejecting the manuscript. It also was a fairly quick process. However, I believe one of the reviews was a bit unprofessional, as they started it by saying they were recommending rejection and then provided reasons for it. This is in contrast to how I've been taught to review a manuscript.
n/a
n/a
49 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
12.7 weeks
12.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
2
1
Rejected
2018
Motivation: it first took the journal 2 months to send out the manuskript. After review, it was immediately rejected, although the paper is a direct replication of another already published paper.