Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 4.4 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Our paper was eventually accepted after a very large revision that took many experiments and resources to carry out. This was stimulated by the fact that all the reviewers wanted many different experiments done for the paper to be a "Neuron paper". I think overall the experience was positive. The editors will do whatever the reviewers indicate, so if the reviewers indicate that you need to do a ton of work for the revision, then either you do it or you look elsewhere.
3.2
Good process
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines