Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Organization Studies has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 5 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 4.1 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 4.1 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 30 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 3.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 2.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

In advance, I presented the paper at the EGOS conference, incorporating virtually all feedback on the short paper, the long paper and the presentation (feedback was great and constructive). Then I submitted the article to OS, waited three weeks and received three totally destructive sentences that the paper was poor quality and immature (after someone apparently looked at the paper for probably five minutes), leaving me without any constructive comments or arguments on how to improve the paper.