Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.3 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
2.3 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
2.3 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
2.7 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
1.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 6.0 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
One reviewer was positive on the article, the other reviewer submitted a negative review based on unfounded motivations, such as complaining about the lack of data that were clearly present in the text. The editor decision was completely unjustified: clearly the reviewer did not read the article at all, or had a negative influence on the authors. The editor approved this review and ignored the other, without a reasonable judgment or motivation. Bad editorial experience.