Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
6.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2024
Motivation:
One reviewer was positive on the article, the other reviewer submitted a negative review based on unfounded motivations, such as complaining about the lack of data that were clearly present in the text. The editor decision was completely unjustified: clearly the reviewer did not read the article at all, or had a negative influence on the authors. The editor approved this review and ignored the other, without a reasonable judgment or motivation. Bad editorial experience.
16.9 weeks
16.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2020
Motivation:
Long time for review
6.5 weeks
6.5 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2014