Review this journal

Nutrition Reviews

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 4.3 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 8.3 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 1.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.5 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 1.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 13.0 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
After submitting revisions and waiting a couple of months, we received a second revision except it had exactly the same comments which had already been addressed. There was a bit of back and forth with the journal. It should have been a quicker process because there was only a single minor revision for the manuscript, which we addressed promptly, yet it took about 6 months to get it accepted from initial submission.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

Issues per year
12
Articles published last year
68
Manuscripts received last year
257
% accepted last year
25
% immediately rejected last year
56
Open access status
optional
Manuscript handling fee?
no
Kind of complaint procedure
Editor
Two-year impact factor
5.59
Five-year impact factor
6.25

About

Nutrition Reviews is a leading peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of authoritative literature reviews that analyze and synthesize existing and emerging knowledge in the field of nutrition science. It is published by the International Life Sciences Institute in partnership with Oxford University Press.