Reviews for "Nutrition Reviews"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Nutrition Reviews 13.0
weeks
30.4
weeks
n/a 1 5
(excellent)
2
(moderate)
Accepted
Motivation: After submitting revisions and waiting a couple of months, we received a second revision except it had exactly the same comments which had already been addressed. There was a bit of back and forth with the journal. It should have been a quicker process because there was only a single minor revision for the manuscript, which we addressed promptly, yet it took about 6 months to get it accepted from initial submission.
Nutrition Reviews 24.0
weeks
24.0
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: The time it took was exceptionally long (24 weeks), and resulted in only 1 reviewer report. The editor apologized for the long waiting time, but it still was a major drawback for this paper.