Latest review
First review round: 5.0 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent).
Outcome: Accepted.
Motivation:
The editor was very professional and punctual.
Two reviewers did constructive comments, while the third one was non understanding basic statistical analyses and was asking experiments already performed in other studies from our group described in the introduction. Further, this reviewer was really unprofessional making jokes in brackets.
But for the rest everything was fine.
