Reviews for "Nucleic Acids Research"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
Nucleic Acids Research 6.0
weeks
6.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2019
Nucleic Acids Research 2.9
weeks
2.9
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2018
Motivation: Strange, possibly biased and short 1/3 page reviews
Nucleic Acids Research 2.7
weeks
4.1
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2018
Motivation: We have been happy with the reviewers comments, which was not only quick but also extremely relevant. It seemed that all 3 reviewers had knowledge on the experimental aspect and data analysis work too. The editorial decision was prompt and efficient. We have also been satisfied with the production and proofreading team. Our paper was online in three weeks after acceptance. Apart from the HEAVY open access fee that is charged, our overall experience with NAR has been positive and we are happy to have our paper published in such a reputed journal.
Nucleic Acids Research 2.9
weeks
3.3
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2017
Nucleic Acids Research 4.0
weeks
10.3
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected 2017
Nucleic Acids Research 2.9
weeks
2.9
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2017
Nucleic Acids Research 2.6
weeks
3.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2017
Nucleic Acids Research 4.4
weeks
7.1
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2016
Nucleic Acids Research 4.0
weeks
7.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2011
Nucleic Acids Research 3.0
weeks
4.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2013
Motivation: All the process was extremely rapid and editor's decision reflected referee's comments. Referees were very fair and constructive.
Nucleic Acids Research 4.0
weeks
4.0
weeks
n/a 4 2
(moderate)
2
(moderate)
Rejected 2013