Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
0.9 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
1.2 months
Decision time immediate rejection
3 days
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
1.5 / 5.0 (easy)
Average number of review reports
2.5 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
2.3 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 6.1 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Drawn back.

Motivation:
Manuscript was reviewed by two people. One gave very minor revisions, all text based, the other wanted a thesis of new experiments done. Even though this was accapted with minor revisions, the editor wrote back two days later saying they changed their mind. Easily the most unprofessional journal out there.
2.0
Moderate process
5 reviews
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines

Neuroscience

Related journals

Neuron Nature Neuroscience Nature Reviews: Neuroscience