Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.4 weeks
3.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
5
Accepted
2025
Motivation: Editorial process was swift and efficient. The reviews were critical, improved the manuscript, and were fair.
4.4 weeks
4.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
2
0
Rejected
2024
Motivation: The reviewers' (x3) comments were reasonable; mostly editorial and without any great insights. However, the editor did not follow suit and made the overriding decision to reject with the possibility to make a new submission following an additional experiment.
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2024
Motivation: While there was no constructive feedback provided, I'd sooner receive the rejection decision early at editorial level and avoid the possibility of months under peer review before finally reaching a decision.
1.7 weeks
3.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
2014