Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Neurocomputing has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 6 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 2.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 3.9 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 17 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 1.8 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.8 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.5 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.7 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 3.5 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

Motivation:
They're said: The associate editor handling the review suggests submitting it to a more specialized journal. This suggestion has been echoed by the fact that there are very few recent Neurocomputing papers in the references. They expect my paper had references to their journal. I think this expectation is not rational nor moral.