Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
2.4 weeks
5.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2024
6.0 weeks
9.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2023
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
n/a
n/a
22 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
n/a
n/a
13 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
Motivation:
They're said:
The associate editor handling the review suggests submitting it to a more specialized journal. This suggestion has been echoed by the fact that there are very few recent Neurocomputing papers in the references.
They expect my paper had references to their journal. I think this expectation is not rational nor moral.
The associate editor handling the review suggests submitting it to a more specialized journal. This suggestion has been echoed by the fact that there are very few recent Neurocomputing papers in the references.
They expect my paper had references to their journal. I think this expectation is not rational nor moral.
7.3 weeks
15.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2021
3.3 weeks
3.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2020
12.0 weeks
20.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2019
12.7 weeks
20.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014