Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.8 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.9 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
4.5 / 5.0

Characteristics of peer review process

Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
1.0 / 5.0 (very easy)
Average number of review reports
3.0 reports
Quality of review reports
4.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 13.0 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Out of the 3 reviews I received, 2 were of specially high quality; both of the suggested revisions but the comments were reasonable and they made me realise where I didn't include enogh details of my analysis in the first version. The third review was quite problematic, though, as this person was evidently biased against the framework and repeatedly misquited both my research and that of others. I highly appreciated the constructive way of handling from the editor, who also evidently took enougth time to read through the paper and make suggestions both during the revision process and during editing.