Review this journal

European Science Editing

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 2.3 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 3.1 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 3.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 5.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 5.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 10.0 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Having published multiple manuscripts with about 40 different journals, my experience with European Science Editing is really great. The journal has a strong editorial team who are very enthusiastic and whole-hearted in supporting authors in improving their manuscripts. The journal has particular strengths in editing manuscripts and submitters can enjoy their expertise and learn much from them, no matter how much previous experience. If I have relevant manuscripts I will certainly submit them to Eur Sci Ed and strongly recommend the journal to those who care about topics in scientific publishing, research integrity, peer review, science editing, and the like.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of European Science Editing has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: General

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.