Reviews for "European Science Editing"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
10.0 weeks
13.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2017
Motivation: Having published multiple manuscripts with about 40 different journals, my experience with European Science Editing is really great. The journal has a strong editorial team who are very enthusiastic and whole-hearted in supporting authors in improving their manuscripts. The journal has particular strengths in editing manuscripts and submitters can enjoy their expertise and learn much from them, no matter how much previous experience. If I have relevant manuscripts I will certainly submit them to Eur Sci Ed and strongly recommend the journal to those who care about topics in scientific publishing, research integrity, peer review, science editing, and the like.