Latest review
First review round: 26.0 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad).
Outcome: Rejected.
Motivation:
Both reviewers said that my article is well written and correct.
They proposed nothing to modify or change.
They just simply rejected it because they thought that it is not important result.
It was clear from the abstract what my article is about. If the content is not interesting, then it should have been desk rejected.
This is kind of a joke, that a well written correct article gets rejected after long peer review.