Review this journal

PLoS Computational Biology

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 10 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 2.4 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 5.0 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 25 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.5 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.2 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.5 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.3 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 13.4 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Accepted.

Very disappointed with the editorial handling of this manuscript. It usually took ~2 weeks to pass the front office and reach the editor's desk. Then it took another ~2-4 weeks until the manuscript was sent out to reviewers. Add 8-12 weeks for reviews (which is fine). Rinse and repeat for 3 demanding revisions, and you end up needing 1.5 years just to get through peer review. When we had to contact the editor in between revisions, we would not get a response for weeks until we directly emailed them at their institutional address. Overall this process has been frustratingly slow - would not recommend.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of PLoS Computational Biology has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.