Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
26.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
Both reviewers said that my article is well written and correct.
They proposed nothing to modify or change.
They just simply rejected it because they thought that it is not important result.
It was clear from the abstract what my article is about. If the content is not interesting, then it should have been desk rejected.
This is kind of a joke, that a well written correct article gets rejected after long peer review.
They proposed nothing to modify or change.
They just simply rejected it because they thought that it is not important result.
It was clear from the abstract what my article is about. If the content is not interesting, then it should have been desk rejected.
This is kind of a joke, that a well written correct article gets rejected after long peer review.
n/a
n/a
21 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)