Review this journal

Current Science

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 3 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 2.3 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 4.1 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 1.5 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.5 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 2.5 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.5 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

Outcome: Drawn back.

Motivation:
I am writing my personal experience with this journal. This journal kept your article in coma for at least one year (on the name of ‘under review “). This journal never replies to author queries. The editor does not cross check to whom he is sending reviewer request (They sent reviewer request to me to review my own paper!!!). Even after clarifying that I am the corresponding author for the manuscript, the editor did not reply to my mail. After waiting for one year 3 months, finally I wrote a mail to editor that I am withdrawing my manuscript due to inordinate delay in processing the manuscript. Again no reply from editor !!! The editorial staff of this journal does not reply to author queries.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Current Science has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a
Disciplines: General

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.