Reviews for "Current Science"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
Drawn back before first editorial decision after 430.0 weeks
Drawn back
2018
Motivation: I am writing my personal experience with this journal. This journal kept your article in coma for at least one year (on the name of ‘under review “). This journal never replies to author queries. The editor does not cross check to whom he is sending reviewer request (They sent reviewer request to me to review my own paper!!!). Even after clarifying that I am the corresponding author for the manuscript, the editor did not reply to my mail. After waiting for one year 3 months, finally I wrote a mail to editor that I am withdrawing my manuscript due to inordinate delay in processing the manuscript. Again no reply from editor !!! The editorial staff of this journal does not reply to author queries.
8.7 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2014
11.3 weeks
22.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
2012
Motivation: I am satisfied with the reviewing process, only the time for the reviews could have been shorter.