Computers in Biology and Medicine

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Computers in Biology and Medicine has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 11 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 1.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 1.6 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 1 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 2.8 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.3 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.5 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.7 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 3.5 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 3.7 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
Crazy review process. We got: major revision / major revision / minor revision / it can be accepted after quick fix-ups / REJECTED. We were very close to the acceptance, and on the penultimate email from the editor Edward Ciaccio we received an email with the following text: > Your manuscript has been carefully reviewed, and we would be happy to publish it, > provided that it is revised in accordance with the enclosed reviewers' comments. The comments were about the improvement of the English grammar of the article. We asked a colleague to perform an English proof-reading and addressed all the changes. Then the editor decided to reject the paper in the end because of few sentences with English mistakes. I will never submit an article to this journal ever again.