Follow @scirev on Twitter
Reviews for "Computers in Biology and Medicine"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome | Year |
| Computers in Biology and Medicine | n/a | n/a | 6.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2022 |
| Motivation: Very superficial reasons given to explain the reject. | ||||||||
| Computers in Biology and Medicine | 3.7 weeks |
7.9 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 1 (bad) |
0 (very bad) |
Rejected | 2021 |
| Motivation: Crazy review process. We got: major revision / major revision / minor revision / it can be accepted after quick fix-ups / REJECTED. We were very close to the acceptance, and on the penultimate email from the editor Edward Ciaccio we received an email with the following text: > Your manuscript has been carefully reviewed, and we would be happy to publish it, > provided that it is revised in accordance with the enclosed reviewers' comments. The comments were about the improvement of the English grammar of the article. We asked a colleague to perform an English proof-reading and addressed all the changes. Then the editor decided to reject the paper in the end because of few sentences with English mistakes. I will never submit an article to this journal ever again. |
||||||||
| Computers in Biology and Medicine | n/a | n/a | 0.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2020 |
| Motivation: Rejection in 1 hour because the editor didn't like the abstract structure. | ||||||||
| Computers in Biology and Medicine | n/a | n/a | 0.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2020 |
| Motivation: The manuscript should be refined for English grammatical structure and phraseology. The manuscript should be polished by an English linguist or language service (note in marked-up copy text where changes are made). Details of author-pays services can be found, for example, at: http://nativeenglishedit.com/ | ||||||||
| Computers in Biology and Medicine | 4.3 weeks |
4.3 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted | 2020 |
| Motivation: High quality reviews, fast handling | ||||||||
| Computers in Biology and Medicine | Drawn back before first editorial decision after 156 days | Drawn back | 2019 | |||||
| Computers in Biology and Medicine | 5.5 weeks |
8.9 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted | 2018 |
| Computers in Biology and Medicine | n/a | n/a | 3.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2016 |
| Computers in Biology and Medicine | 4.1 weeks |
4.6 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted | 2017 |
| Motivation: Quick reviewing process with nice suggestions of the reviewers in the meantime that have contributed to improve final quality of the work | ||||||||
| Computers in Biology and Medicine | 4.0 weeks |
8.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected | 2016 |
| Computers in Biology and Medicine | n/a | n/a | 1.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2016 |
| Computers in Biology and Medicine | 5.0 weeks |
9.0 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted | 2015 |