Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 8.1 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The editorial process was exceptionally fast and efficient. The manuscript was sent for review within a few days of submission, and the first decision was returned in approximately 4–5 weeks. Subsequent decisions were also handled promptly, which was particularly helpful given my limited timeline due to a degree requirement. The reviewer comments were of high quality and highly constructive. They provided detailed and insightful feedback that substantially improved the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. The submission system was user-friendly, and communication with the editorial office was smooth and appropriate throughout. Overall, this was a highly positive and well-managed review experience.
4.7
Excellent process
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines