Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.1 weeks
10.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2025
Motivation:
The editorial process was exceptionally fast and efficient. The manuscript was sent for review within a few days of submission, and the first decision was returned in approximately 4–5 weeks. Subsequent decisions were also handled promptly, which was particularly helpful given my limited timeline due to a degree requirement.
The reviewer comments were of high quality and highly constructive. They provided detailed and insightful feedback that substantially improved the clarity and rigor of the manuscript.
The submission system was user-friendly, and communication with the editorial office was smooth and appropriate throughout.
Overall, this was a highly positive and well-managed review experience.
The reviewer comments were of high quality and highly constructive. They provided detailed and insightful feedback that substantially improved the clarity and rigor of the manuscript.
The submission system was user-friendly, and communication with the editorial office was smooth and appropriate throughout.
Overall, this was a highly positive and well-managed review experience.
12.4 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2022
Motivation:
Overall, we are happy with the review process: the reviewers that examine our paper took their time and made a detailed and knowledgeable review that [we think] improved our work. The only annoying thing about the review process was the initial waiting time. We waited for 16 weeks for the first round, while in the second one it was only 5 weeks. But again, in general, it was a good process.
1.4 weeks
2.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
Very fast review process!