Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.0 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
3.3 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
I think the review process was relatively shorter than other journal.
15.4 weeks
21.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
Rather slow editorial and review process
19.5 weeks
19.5 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2014
4.1 weeks
4.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2015
Motivation:
It was decided to be outside the scope. Although we are generally satisfied, it is unfortunate that this decision was not made by the editor directly. As the review process went quickly, we did not loose to much time.
5.3 weeks
9.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
fast review process, good remarks of the reviewers. A downside was the long period of quality checking after the submission of the revised manuscript.
11.0 weeks
26.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015