Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
14 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2013
Motivation:
Our manuscript was rejected without in-depth review process, the journal did nor provide any scientific reasons for the rejection. The editors have felt that the scope of the manuscript would fit to a more applied and specilized journal.
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014
Motivation:
There was really no justification except its not interesting enough to a broad readership. However, they have, over the past years, published much more specialized papers from the big names in the field. I guess the name is more important than the scientific quality.
n/a
n/a
21 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2013
n/a
n/a
14 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2013
n/a
n/a
9 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2013