Reviews for "Nature"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
Nature n/a n/a 42.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2011
Motivation: The requirements for the journal to even send our paper out for review were too stringent. The number of experiments, all in vivo, that they requested to consider a future resubmission would have doubled the amount of data in the paper. We did not consider all the requested experiments to be critical for the story we were presenting.
Nature n/a n/a 52.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2013
Nature n/a n/a 1.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2012
Nature n/a n/a 35.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2012
Nature n/a n/a 27.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2015
Nature n/a n/a 3.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2015
Nature n/a n/a 1.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2015
Nature n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Motivation: Criteria for suitability to Nature are not clear, speaking seriously.
Nature 11.6
weeks
11.6
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2015
Nature 4.4
weeks
5.4
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2014
Nature n/a n/a 15.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Nature n/a n/a 2.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2015
Nature n/a n/a 5.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2015
Motivation: Presubmission enquiries very useful.
Nature n/a n/a 0.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2013
Motivation: Nature set a record in my lab by rejecting our paper in under 3 hours. I sincerely doubt that the editor carefully considered whether to send our paper out to review.
Nature n/a n/a 2.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2015
Nature n/a n/a 2.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2013
Nature n/a n/a 2.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2013