Reviews for "International Journal of Technology Management"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
International Journal of Technology Management 23.6
n/a 2 0
(very bad)
(very bad)
Motivation: After one year and four months of our initial submission, at least we expected a little respect for what we've done. The paper was revised and resubmitted, and the editor simply rejected the paper based on arguments from previous revisions. We answered all questions raised by reviewers and aligned the paper accordingly to the suggestions formulated and approximately after seven months the editor made copied parts from the last revision and rejected the paper. You'll notice that the editor from IJTM is also an editor for several inderscience journals, but this is not an excuse to do not respect authors and their work. Don't waste your time with IJTM or with other inderscience journals edited by the same person.