Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
5.4 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
11.9 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
5.0 / 5.0 (very difficult)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
0.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
0.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 23.6 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
After one year and four months of our initial submission, at least we expected a little respect for what we've done. The paper was revised and resubmitted, and the editor simply rejected the paper based on arguments from previous revisions. We answered all questions raised by reviewers and aligned the paper accordingly to the suggestions formulated and approximately after seven months the editor made copied parts from the last revision and rejected the paper. You'll notice that the editor from IJTM is also an editor for several inderscience journals, but this is not an excuse to do not respect authors and their work. Don't waste your time with IJTM or with other inderscience journals edited by the same person.