Reviews for "Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 15.0
n/a 3 4
(very good)
Motivation: The associate editor had trouble getting people to agree to be reviewers which explains the long waiting time. The review process moved forward after numerous emails to the editor-in-chief. Even though the paper was rejected, the high quality reviews were very helpful. One of the reviewers also corrected the typos and language style.