Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
15.0 weeks
15.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
The associate editor had trouble getting people to agree to be reviewers which explains the long waiting time. The review process moved forward after numerous emails to the editor-in-chief. Even though the paper was rejected, the high quality reviews were very helpful. One of the reviewers also corrected the typos and language style.